The Building Code Discussion Group is sponsored by Interwest Consulting Group & Naffa International, providers of building inspection, plan check and other services for municipalities in the United States. Please visit our website at www.interwestgrp.com
For support regarding problems with the Building Code Discussion Group site, please email Richard at firstname.lastname@example.org
Hello, I hope I am not too much of a noob asking this, but I'm working on a project where we are designing a facility in Portugal, and I've ran into a bit of a dead end having to do with which building codes I should be aiming for with respect to platforms, guardrails, ladders and stairs. This is meant for an industrial application. I am able to follow IBC code pretty well, but when I get to designing the ladders, I find a hole in IBC code where I find no specs on ladder designs, i.e. cages, rung spacing, connection details, etc. Where would be a good resource to find out which codes I have to follow and can anybody give me some insight into anything I need to do differently than with OSHA building codes?
2010 CBC 1115B.8.3 Towel, sanitary napkins, waste receptacles, dispensers and controls. Where towel, sanitary napkins, waste receptacles, dispensers, other equipment and controls are provided, at least one of each type shall be located on an accessible route, with all operable parts, including coin slots, within 40 inches (1016 mm) from the finished floor and shall comply with Section 1117B.6, Controls and operating mechanisms.
2013 CBC 11B-603.5 Accessories. Where towel or sanitary napkin dispensers, waste receptacles, or other accessories are provided in toilet facilities, at least one of each type shall be located on an accessible route. All operable parts, including coin slots, shall be 40 inches (1016 mm) maximum above the finished floor.
2010 CBC 1115B.8.3 states "at least one of each type shall be located on an accessible route, with all operable parts ... within 40 inches." 2013 CBC 11B-603.5 breaks up the provision into two sentences as follows: "at least one of each type shall be located on an accessible route. All operable parts ... shall be 40 inches."
Based on this sentence structure, it is clear that "at least one" accessory is required on an accessible route. However, does the next sentence refer to the operable parts of "all" accessories, or "all" accessories that are on the accessible route, i.e., the one of each type? Was there a change in intent.
Bradley the ADA Geek. Niavete is my strength. I seek to understand. I strive for perfection. And I can't type for crap so please forgive me.
Am I correct in reading the 2010 ADA Standards and the new CBC that library book stack aisles that serve both sides must be 44" wide, or 36" wide if they serve only one side based on the requirements stated in 11B-403.5.1?
The new hotel building is a 4-story type VA that sits on a type I podium used for parking and entry lobby. There is also 1-1/2 levels of basement parking. The second floor has a restaurant and guest units on the same level. Because of the sprinklers, we are able to raise it 1-story and an additional 12,000 sf. Will the sprinkler help per floor to increase the allowable area (table 503) which is 12,000 to a much higher figure for the sum of ratios calculation? Based on 506.4, the sum of ratios for Group A & R and some others cannot exceed 2 in multi-story buildings. The numbers add up to more than that (3.25 to be exact) especially adding one more floor due to sprinklers. Can you subtract areas that are non-occupiable such as restrooms, corridors, and stair/ elevator shafts? It's hard to get a sum of two. Is it a catch 22?
We've got an all metal carport next to a 2 story R-2 apartment building. The carport fascia is 8'-0" from the apartment wall. We have taken the area increase for fire sprinklers and the building fits into the Type V-B allowable area, including the area of the carport. Does the carport require fire sprinklers?
Our firm is currently working on four multi-family projects under the current CBC and we're receiving conflicting information about whether or not our permits, when issued in 2014 will have today's building code requirements grandfathered, or will be required to meet the 2014. This is particularly critical due to energy requirements and minimum threshold standards going up 25% according to our MEP's. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.
Can two different door rough openings use the same king stud? The pocket door header would be 2 x 10s butted up to top cap. I would be able to either use very long nails to go through the upper cripple stud of the left door through king stud into header of pocket door or maybe use lag bolts instead. I need to use the existing king stud for both doors to allow needed width of pocket door for wheelchair access. This is a load bearing inside wall and I could use the needed double jack studs on each end.
We have a long corridor and I check in NFPA 101, the travel distance to exit from corridor shall be 30 mtrs also there is a chance of the movement of Fire & Smoke.
We have given additional exit door to come up with the problem with the travel distace. But, to limit the smoke or Fire movement we have to provide the Doors in the corridor. I cannot find the in NFPA the Fire Rating of the door. I check NFPA 101 and 80. does any one have any suggestion
Naffa Internaional, Inc was purchased by Interwest Consulting Group in January of 2012. We believe the BCDG is a valuable resource to the building design and code enforcement community. We will continue the Forum under the new platform, Hoop.la, to provide this great resource to our clients and the general public. THE BCDG .... is a...