My question is does the non-separated use analysis also apply to the separation wall requirement for Sleeping Units as described in section 419.2?
Non-separated uses vs. detailed requirements
My question is does the non-separated use analysis also apply to the separation wall requirement for Sleeping Units as described in section 419.2?
Section 419.2 refers you to Section 708 and Case #2 refers to a sleeping room within a hotel, apartemsnt or an institution. In this case, teh fire station is not covered and a separation should not be required. (especially if there is a 24-hour fire watch available).
Chuck daleo
The walls would have to comply with Section 708 "fire partitions" irregardless if the building is analyzed as nonseparated occupancies using provisions of Section 508.3.2.
DBSCode: Why wouldn't the fire partitions between the sleeping rooms be rated? The sleeping rooms within the fire station would be classified as R-2 occupancy and item #2 in Section 708.1 would apply.
Some more discussions on the subject of Fire Stations and occupancy classification:
http://bcodes.infopop.cc/eve/f...59&a=tpc&f=914093073
Also, when the requirement to separate dwelling units and sleeping rooms in a hotel or motel first was codified, the reason was that a person(s) sleeping in such a facility has no control over teh activities next door that could create a hazard. In a fire station, this is not a concern beacuse they should know what they are doing and can control the activities.
Let's get real here. When is the last time a fire station burned down?
Also, why do you think a one-hour rating is required? It allows time for teh fire departemnt to show up and suppress teh fire and rescue the occupants, if the smoke hasn't gotten to them already.
If a one-hour fire partition is required then let teh building department pay for it.
Chuck Daleo

I'll buy your arguments. I think you are on the right track on this one. Besides, BD's are broke these days (most of them), so no one will volunteer to pay for those partitions
